Tuesday, 25 November 2014
Interclass Competition rules for Saturday 6th of December.
Interclass open rules.
For those of you judging and fighting on the 6th of December, here are is the simple version of the rules based around 4 ring judges and 1 centre judge.
Fighters and judges do not need to worry about the number values that is for the score keeper. Judges simply worry about the "minor major and doubles".
Hits of quality:
Competitors are expected to illustrate good technique, so cuts and thrusts must have a clear path of intent.
In the case of cuts, a cut through or into a target, not a tap shot.
In the case of thrusts the thrust may be put in, or arrested out of courtesy but must reach the opponent with potential to extend into a full thrust.
Judges are able to dismiss touches they do not feel meets the above criteria.
Bout duration:
Each fight will be to ten points or two minutes. Whichever comes first.
Scoring:
We have returned a little to the original open rules concept. This will be a little more complex but I hope the judges will make them work.
Starting allocation:
Each competitor will start the fight with 10 points, hits will be subtracted from this, the fight will be ended when one competitor reaches goes to zero or below or the time runs out.
Values:
Major hits.
A hit of good quality to any target that goes unanswered.
Instant doubles and following afters of good quality (-2 points).
Minor hits.
A follow on blow to a lesser target or of poor quality (-1 point).
Double strikes and afterblows:
Double strikes count against both parties and are simply scored major blows (-2/-2) However, we have added the "following after" distinction.
Instant: When the blows land at the same time and at identical distance the score is double (-2/-2).
After: If the after blow is given, with an action of following after and involves a movement of the foot or feet it must hit even or greater value.
So if party A strikes a limb party B can strike back at limb, torso or head to score a double (-2/-2) .
If party A strikes head or torso, party B must likewise hit head or torso to score. in the event of a strike to the limb the score is given major/minor(-2/-1).
Limb interrupts:
Shots will be judged by distance and path, so a cut which would reach head or torso but has a limb in the way will be counted as a major strike so if you put your hand in front of your face to stop that cut...
Hit calls.
Hits must be confirmed by 2 or more ring judges.
So to score at least two judges must flag in your favour.
On witnessing a successful hit a ring judge will call hit and hold the flags thus:
Major hits: Arm vertical 2 points.
Double: crossed flags above head (X)
Minor following major hits (as in a poor following after) arm held at 90 degrees to the side (the major as stated being held vertical).
The center judge will call "halt" after hearing 2 or more calls of "hit"
This marks the limit of the afterblow. Fighters will remain where they maintaining readiness, the centre judge will either call a hit value (for example major against blue, minor against red) at which point fighters will move to their corners. Or if no confirmed hits are made the judge will call "fight on" the fight will then continue from where it left off.
Grips and grapples.
If the limb or weapon is held immobile no after blow is allowed upon it's release. A hit must still be delivered to score with the grip,
The floor at this venue is unsuitable for grappling so no going to the floor.
Dussak:
When fighting dussak hits to the weapon hand will not score, this being considered protected.
General.
In all fights control is expected. Avoid hitting too hard, avoid hitting the joints and to the neck.
Monday, 3 November 2014
I'm not on a boat.
It was asked today why I haven't traveled overseas to teach very much this year when there have been several very kind offers to do so.
Well tonight sums it up.
Every time my students turn up and put so much effort into understanding, when on lacking understanding they ask the right questions, when they show such diligence that it makes me want to applaud....That's where we have a problem.
I love when each student makes a jump in comprehension, how that drives me to research more.
I love when that perfect shot from a student, played for and got sneaks through and you know that that application is comprehension embodied...But of course that may be an issue.
Well tonight sums it up.
Every time my students turn up and put so much effort into understanding, when on lacking understanding they ask the right questions, when they show such diligence that it makes me want to applaud....That's where we have a problem.
I love when each student makes a jump in comprehension, how that drives me to research more.
I love when that perfect shot from a student, played for and got sneaks through and you know that that application is comprehension embodied...But of course that may be an issue.
The problem is I cannot leave a class when they show such desire to learn and improve.
The issue is they do, and that drives me and makes me reluctant to leave...even for a week.
Maybe next year I will try and travel out of the UK again, the offers mean a lot, but these buggers have me hooked.
The issue is they do, and that drives me and makes me reluctant to leave...even for a week.
Maybe next year I will try and travel out of the UK again, the offers mean a lot, but these buggers have me hooked.
Tuesday, 14 October 2014
What's new.
The crystal palace class is up and running, at the moment it is dussack only as demand for that was so high. All being well we will be starting the spear class an hour before hand. I will let you know as soon as I can get the hall time booked and confirmed.
As you can see from the schedule below, I am taking Tuesday evenings off until the new year the plan being to have two on the Thursday instead.
So, while I enjoy the prospect of reading more and playing with the cat this eve, enjoy a little clip from the Monday Class.
Schedule.
Monday Barbican 8pm: Rapier/rapier and dagger.
Wednesday Blackfriars 8.30pm: Sword and buckler/ sword and shield.
Thursday Crystal Palace 8pm: Dussack.
Friday Highgate: Longsword.
Train hard:).
As you can see from the schedule below, I am taking Tuesday evenings off until the new year the plan being to have two on the Thursday instead.
So, while I enjoy the prospect of reading more and playing with the cat this eve, enjoy a little clip from the Monday Class.
Schedule.
Monday Barbican 8pm: Rapier/rapier and dagger.
Wednesday Blackfriars 8.30pm: Sword and buckler/ sword and shield.
Thursday Crystal Palace 8pm: Dussack.
Friday Highgate: Longsword.
Train hard:).
Monday, 29 September 2014
Crystal Palace class, starts this Thurdsay.
From Thursday the 2nd of October, we have a new class starting in Crystal Palace, at the Harris Academy/Lewis sports centre, Maberley Road SE19 2JH. The group will focus on the dussack and spear and will run from 8-9.30pm. We are already running out of places, so if you want to give it a go get in touch quickly. Please be aware that our classes are not walk in. If you wish to train, please email first providing a telephone number.
Monday, 25 August 2014
New kings for old.
It's nice to be able to talk about this at last. In case you haven't seen it yet, I was the resident master at arms for the Channel 4 documentary Richard III the New Evidence. I had great fun with this and got to work with a fantastic crew throughout.
A little about what we did.
Dominic is a very slight guy so to throw himself into a training regime. It was a big step up and something to be proud of.
We worked a quite hard routine, which mixed aspects of Talhoffer's messer, and Paulus Hector Mair's sickle to work with the blows and potential snare ups from battleaxe and war-hammer combat. From the little sneaky clips I was sent, it was clear that Dominic was not only paying lip service to learning but genuinely committing time to practice what he was taught. It was a pleasure to be involved. Take a look at the link, I hope you will enjoy it,
What's gone on.
Lots as usual, more Meyer Rapier every Monday at the Barbican. Soon we will shift to another master for a while but still staying on rapier.
Tuesdays in Beckenham, spear and staff, completing the mittelhau drill and just for fun a dussack tournament.
Wednesday at Blackfriars, sword and buckler. Purely fighting for the last two weeks, experimenting with rule variations and last week, just fighting.
Thursday in Clapham, I had a night off. Thanks so much to Charles for taking the class. This week more mixed weapons.
Friday (as you can see from the picture above) is longsword, last week was a lot of foot work, working on balance and choice variations from the first step. very hard work, very well done. We are off this Friday as the hall is closed, but we are back to normal next week.
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Lignitzer flow drill. Warning clip contains swearing.
In the video below (from a Wednesday class this week) we are working through one of our varied Lignitzer flow drills. There are a few points I want to mention as we go through.
First of all, one of the mistakes I think I and others have made, is that the first action of the opponent is a counter cut, or we counter cut them. This has led to two flawed assumptions.
Firstly in the case of the common interpretation it has made the technique into a poorly and dangerous zornhau extrapolation where none is suggested by the text.
In the case of our previous interpretation we made the assumption that like I.33 the opponent would block or bind with both sword and shield, again an assumption there is no evidence for (if he does it necessitates the wind and thrust be combined), but as I just mentioned there is no evidence in the text that he does.
So I took a simpler approach that works against more common fencing meaning the block with the buckler/shield and counter strike.
So in this we use a simple premise, that in lifting the shield to parry, he covers the eyes, so we recover the thrust beneath.
The wind against his sword can now be achieved in many varied ways, depending on the direction of the block and counter, which means that the same text can be used to cover a multiple of techniques using the same form.
This has worked very well in sparring so I feel we are closer to the truth.
The second point is one of distance, I am going against someone standing with the sword in a second or some variation of a high right ward, not against a vertical ward as this would be dangerous and open. Also not against a thrusting ward as he would attack me on the thrusting line below my shield, again dangerous to me.
Because of this right high posture, the fact that I enter with the cut first means my point or blow will still arrive first as his is more rearward.
The third point is one of the rebound from the over bind on my left (in fact in my center, but apperently on my left. This is the same as the changing strike position for the sake of the drill. It works in the same way though I am starting it from a slightly different point to link the drills.
Finally I cut to Luke's left leg in the last motion, simply because he is not passing forwards with his right leg with the blow from his right side, were he to do so I would be striking his right leg as per the text.
First of all, one of the mistakes I think I and others have made, is that the first action of the opponent is a counter cut, or we counter cut them. This has led to two flawed assumptions.
Firstly in the case of the common interpretation it has made the technique into a poorly and dangerous zornhau extrapolation where none is suggested by the text.
In the case of our previous interpretation we made the assumption that like I.33 the opponent would block or bind with both sword and shield, again an assumption there is no evidence for (if he does it necessitates the wind and thrust be combined), but as I just mentioned there is no evidence in the text that he does.
So I took a simpler approach that works against more common fencing meaning the block with the buckler/shield and counter strike.
So in this we use a simple premise, that in lifting the shield to parry, he covers the eyes, so we recover the thrust beneath.
The wind against his sword can now be achieved in many varied ways, depending on the direction of the block and counter, which means that the same text can be used to cover a multiple of techniques using the same form.
This has worked very well in sparring so I feel we are closer to the truth.
The second point is one of distance, I am going against someone standing with the sword in a second or some variation of a high right ward, not against a vertical ward as this would be dangerous and open. Also not against a thrusting ward as he would attack me on the thrusting line below my shield, again dangerous to me.
Because of this right high posture, the fact that I enter with the cut first means my point or blow will still arrive first as his is more rearward.
The third point is one of the rebound from the over bind on my left (in fact in my center, but apperently on my left. This is the same as the changing strike position for the sake of the drill. It works in the same way though I am starting it from a slightly different point to link the drills.
Finally I cut to Luke's left leg in the last motion, simply because he is not passing forwards with his right leg with the blow from his right side, were he to do so I would be striking his right leg as per the text.
One of those lessons...
One of those lessons...
You know that one where the heat and the day have got to you yet still, despite all that you head along to training?
Here's a some shots from the last few lessons. Friday was going through posture mechanics for cutting and a cool disarm from the thwart (plus the tasteful little extra I show here), also a little staff work from yesterday, working a strike to the flank from a high bind on the left.
I didn't take any photos on Monday, but without exception every student at every lesson this week and last worked incredibly hard and showed good improvement. Which brings me back to the "have you ever had one of those lessons". One of the students turned up last night, looking absolutely bloody shattered after a long tortuous shift, they struggled with the flank strike with the short staff throughout the majority of the lesson
so I on, several occasions made the offer for them to sit out and take a breather. They didn't. When it came to their turn to carry out the winding, grinding drill with the 8' poles. I though they would flake.
However, having watched everyone else have trouble with the drill, loosing contact, snapping between positions too quickly and creating an opening, this student didn't they maintained fluidity and structure and above all control of the bind. To finish a lesson like this and perfect so much at the last moment is an excellent show of determination. Liz we are massively proud of you.
Here's a some shots from the last few lessons. Friday was going through posture mechanics for cutting and a cool disarm from the thwart (plus the tasteful little extra I show here), also a little staff work from yesterday, working a strike to the flank from a high bind on the left.
I didn't take any photos on Monday, but without exception every student at every lesson this week and last worked incredibly hard and showed good improvement. Which brings me back to the "have you ever had one of those lessons". One of the students turned up last night, looking absolutely bloody shattered after a long tortuous shift, they struggled with the flank strike with the short staff throughout the majority of the lesson
so I on, several occasions made the offer for them to sit out and take a breather. They didn't. When it came to their turn to carry out the winding, grinding drill with the 8' poles. I though they would flake.
However, having watched everyone else have trouble with the drill, loosing contact, snapping between positions too quickly and creating an opening, this student didn't they maintained fluidity and structure and above all control of the bind. To finish a lesson like this and perfect so much at the last moment is an excellent show of determination. Liz we are massively proud of you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)